|
Inside New Berlin
October 2008 - Posts
By Linda Richter
Friday, Oct 31 2008, 02:40 PM
My dear mother passed away Sunday after a courageous battle with cancer.
I am glad her pain and suffering has ended and she’s found peace.
But oh, how I miss her.
I love you mom.
|
By Linda Richter
Friday, Oct 24 2008, 07:45 PM
Well, okay, one peanut.
That’s my grandson in the photo. His peanut costume was purchased last year from BuySeasons.
BuySeasons, Inc. is located at 5915 S. Moorland Road in New Berlin.
It is the world’s largest Internet retailer and supplier of costumes, accessories, seasonal décor and party supplies.
|
By Linda Richter
Thursday, Oct 23 2008, 07:46 PM
For Sarah Palin to be so amazingly clueless and WRONG about what the Vice President---the position she is running for---actually does, would be comical if it was not so disturbing.
Click on this link for the video and Keith Olbermann's comments.
|
By Linda Richter
Sunday, Oct 19 2008, 06:11 PM
Earlier this month, John McCain was booed by his supporters at a Republican rally. (See Fox News article )
Sarah Palin was "resoundingly" booed at the October 11 Flyers vs. Rangers National Hockey League game. The owner of the Philadelphia Flyers team had invited her to drop the ceremonial first puck of the Flyer’s opener. (See New York Times article)
Is there any acceptable excuse for those mobs to exhibit such disrespectful, boorish behavior?
|
By Linda Richter
Friday, Oct 17 2008, 12:17 AM
According to an article posted on New BerlinNOW Community Watch Thursday:
A New Berlin man was arrested and faces state disorderly conduct charges with a hate crime enhancer for confronting a black man in a bar (Calhoun Station in New Berlin) on October 8 and telling him that he did not belong there because of his race.
I guess the community resident does not believe in equality, civil rights, or we are all God's children.
It’s distressing that racism still exists in the United States of America, including here in our own city.
Kudos to the bar employees who contacted police.
|
By Linda Richter
Tuesday, Oct 14 2008, 08:13 AM
The Huffington Post informs us that the non-partisan group Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) Action Fund, as part of its Congressional report card, gave Sen. Barack Obama a “B+” grade for his voting record on issues such as additional funding for combat body armor, post-traumatic stress disorder and other medical treatment. Sen. John McCain got a "D" grade.
That was for 2006. For the year 2007-08, Sen. McCain got a “D” from IAVA and Sen. Obama received a “B”. See Veteran Report Card and Project Vote Smart Web sites.
"The mission of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America is to ensure the enactment of policies that properly provide for our Troops & Veterans, keep our military strong, and guarantee our national security for the purpose of a stronger America. We uniquely empower Iraq & Afghanistan combat veterans to use their credibility and experiences to speak truth to power, shape public opinion, and place a priority on these issues."
Additionally, Project Vote Smart reports that for his voting record on veterans issues, Sen. Obama earned an 80 percent rating from the non-partisan group Disabled American Veterans (DAV). Sen. McCain got a 20 percent rating.
“Formed in 1920 and chartered by Congress in 1932, the million-member DAV is the official voice of America’s service-connected disabled veterans--a strong, insistent voice that represents all of America’s 2.1 million disabled veterans, their families and survivors.”
|
By Linda Richter
Friday, Oct 10 2008, 01:05 AM
Many of Sarah Palin’s comments have raised people's eyebrows.
It was interesting to read in Associated Press Writer Jim Kuhnhenn’s Friday, Oct. 3 news article titled “Palin questions McCain’s concession of Michigan", that Sarah Palin had only learned about John McCain’s decision to abandon efforts to win Michigan when she read it in the newspapers on that Friday morning.
When she read it in the newspapers that morning?
Uh, Gov. Palin, the VP candidate, wasn’t part of the decision, consulted or notified?
Per the news report, she said after reading about the decision, she “fired off a quick email questioning the move.”
Hmmm. If Sen. McCain and the McCain presidential campaign do not value Sarah Palin’s opinion, why should the voters?
Evidently, Sarah Palin was very surprised by what she read.
Of course, she wouldn’t be the only person to experience that----
During my tenure on the New Berlin School Board, I was amazed to read in the New Berlin Citizen newspaper that then-NBPS Superintendent James Benfield had accepted a superintendent’s position in North Carolina/ signed a contract. I had not been informed or notified by Dr. Benfield. (Nor by any School Board official).
Guess what happened next? Acceptance by the School Board of his resignation was put on the next New Berlin School Board meeting agenda. However, at that Board meeting, Dr. Benfield surprised folks again by announcing he’d changed his mind and intended to continue at New Berlin Public Schools.
|
By Linda Richter
Monday, Oct 6 2008, 07:40 PM
In 2006, the New Berlin School Board made a rash, imprudent decision to remove from its next year’s budget the $7000 dues for Wisconsin Association of School Boards (WASB) and withdraw from the organization. It was the only school board to do so.
Well, guess what? Last month, the School Board voted unanimously to rejoin WASB.
WASB is a non-profit, membership organization and shared resource for governing leaders. It shares information among school boards and offers services and programs in the areas of school law, policy, governance, legislative activity and employee relations.
Robert Butler, legal counsel for WASB, was at the September 8, 2008 New Berlin School Board Meeting to discuss the benefits of membership and answer questions. He explained that WASB, a voluntary organization, charges an annual fee of $7400, and the other school boards in the state are WASB members.
To his credit, NBPS District Superintendent Paul Kreutzer recommended rejoining WASB. Touting WASB as a valuable resource, he referred to its digital library, policy review services and publication of legal comments--and financial benefits to the District with WASB membership. Dr. Kreutzer argued that the difficulty and cost in having the District conduct its own research/ review of policies and legislation and retain attorneys knowledgeable in educational practice law exceeds the fee ($7400) charged by WASB annually.
In response to SB officer Joan Doberstein’s observation that WASB also offers legal counsel services for collective bargaining/greviances (on a fee basis above the $7400 annual fee), Dr. Kreutzer responded that the School District would not be using that particular WASB service because the District was happy with the law firm it currently uses for labor negotiations (von Briesen & Roper). However, Dr. Kreutzer admitted that their hourly rate/ legal services would likely cost the District more than using WASB’s. Gee, that doesn't sound very "fiscally conservative".
The motion to approve New Berlin Public School's Membership in WASB included a friendly amendment from Jennifer Eitel requiring administration to report back to the School Board at the first meeting in 2009 to show a cost/benefit analysis of membership.
During the Sept. 8 meeting, Board President Matt Thomas acknowledged that he had “led” the school board in its decision two years ago to get out of WASB. The motion to withdraw from WASB was actually made on June 12, 2006 and passed with Matt Thomas, Keith Heun, Jennifer Eitel and Susan Manley voting yes. Matt Weiss, Art Marquardt and Marc Duff voted no.
Thomas’ explanation for that action was that the School Board wanted to cut costs from the budget, SB members objected to a statement (which Thomas deemed “extreme left” and “liberal”) made by the WASB President concerning the proposed Taxpayer Bill of Rights, and the “previous administration” didn’t present much of a cost/benefit analysis regarding WASB membership.
Gimme a break.
Thomas is trying to make Dr. Benfield’s administration the scapegoat?
Just what stopped Thomas and the rest of the School Board in 2006 from doing their homework by researching the issue, asking questions, weighing pros & cons of withdrawal from WASB and the effect on the school district, financial and otherwise? Why didn't THEY request a cost/benefit analysis?
And how irresponsible to put the blame for that School Board’s radical decision on a statement made by the WASB President!
Apparently, Board members Thomas, Heun, Eitel and Manley did not realize or care that every school district gets one delegate vote and that the WASB President was advocating on behalf of the majority. Unlike that renegade New Berlin School Board, the other school boards in the state--including those in Waukesha County-- have had the good sense to recognize that WASB membership was beneficial to their districts and did not drop out.
|
More Posts
The opinions and views expressed by Community Voice writers do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Journal Interactive, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel or Community Newspapers. MyCommunityNow.com does not control, is not responsible for, and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of, the postings on this Web log. Readers can report objectionable content by clicking here.
|
|